A new interpretation of article 232 of the CIR/92 by the tax office results in an extended tax filing obligation for non-residents. As a result of the new interpretation, a much larger group of non-residents with Belgian real estate, suddenly must file a tax return in Belgium.
Belgian real estate income had to be declared even in the past, but only if there was a rental or if there was also other income taxable in Belgium (income mentioned in art. 228, §2, 3°, a and e, 4°, 5°, 6°, 7°, 7°bis and 9° a/1 and h ITC/92). It could be, for example, remuneration, income as a director of a company or a pension.
New is the deletion of the word “taxable” in the above paragraph. According to the tax authorities, there is no requirement at all that the other income (for example, the pension or remuneration) be taxable in Belgium. This is often not the case in application of a tax treaty or if the income is not of Belgian source. The tax authorities now argue that the requirement, that Belgium has taxing jurisdiction over the other income, based on double taxation treaties, is not specifically stated in the law and therefore believe this allows them to start taxing all Belgian real estate, leased or not, as soon as any form of professional income can be detected anywhere in the world.
The first target group of the new interpretation are pensioners with Belgian-sourced pensions, which can be exempted from tax in Belgium in application of a tax treaty. From now on, they must always declare their Belgian property as non-residen taxpayers, regardless of whether the property it is rented or not and regardless of the taxable basis. Because these are Belgian-sourced pensions, it is easy for the tax authorities to target these people because the Belgian pension information automatically enters the tax databases. Their property income (at least equal to the indexed cadastral income, multiplied by 1.4 and reduced by loan interest) is then taxed immediately from the first euro at the normal rates, starting at 26.75% (including the municipal tax).
The new interpretation has important consequences for all non-residents owning real estate located in Belgium.
The new interpretation also completely erodes the old 2,500 Euro (per owner) exemption. This exemption applied when only immovable property was held in Belgium, of which at least one unit was rented out. Only when the total taxable income of all real estate taken together exceeded 2,500 Euro a tax return up to now had to be filed. Because the forementioned limit amount is not indexed from year to year, this exemption has anyhow already eroded over the years anyway, which only further questions the usefulness of the recent new interpretation.
Moreover, the tax authorities want to apply the new interpretation already for income year 2023. The filing period for this expires in a good month. The question can therefore be raised whether it is useful or reasonable to come up with this new obligation so late in the year, merely based on a reinterpretation of a legal text, which has remained unchanged for years. That numerous taxpayers will not be compliant for income year 2023 is already certain.
Some further comments can be added related to the new interpretation.